Blue Water Bridge Expansion: What you really need to know
thetimesherald.com, November 20,2007
Mike Connell recently posed a Q and A in his article to address, in his opinion, possible issues with the Blue Water Bridge expansion. However some of the questions and answers are flawed. For example, Mr. Connell quotes the MDOT as stating that owners are better off selling the property because they obtain 125% of their own value. The problem is that the offer may be far less than 100% of the value. The 125% applies to the total amount paid, whether by settlement or trial or a simple deed. Mr. Connell forgets the rights of individual owners can be protected.
The intent of the article is to show that the government will take the property, and the owners have no rights to challenge the amounts. Further it appears from the article owners should simply succumb to the governmental desires. This is simply wrong!
There is no question about public use for the International Bridge, nor is there a question that we must secure our borders. However, there is still the requirement of "just compensation" in both the Michigan and United States Constitution.
